top of page

Space and Military Intelligence Landscape Evaluation - 2460829

Updated: Aug 20

Good morning. Here is your updated weekly overview of key developments at the intersection of Space, Military Intelligence, Quantum Intelligence, Social Engineering, and Sustainable Globalization, with a focus on supply chain and infrastructure integrity:


I. Space and Military Intelligence: Contracts and Infrastructure

The trend of integrating commercial capabilities into national security space architecture continues to accelerate. The U.S. Space Force's significant National Security Space Launch (NSSL) Phase 3 contracts, totaling up to $13.68 billion awarded to SpaceX ($5.92 billion), ULA ($5.37 billion), and Blue Origin ($2.39 billion), will cover the procurement of critical space support aimed at meeting national security objectives for the next decade. This, along with plans for more commercial reserve fleet pilots in 2025 for satellite communications, small launch providers, and tactical surveillance, reconnaissance, and tracking, signals a strategic reliance on the private sector to bolster military space capabilities.


On the terrestrial front, the U.S. Army is heavily investing in modernizing its tactical network. While the previously mentioned $373 million contract to Trace Systems Inc. focused on upgrading satellite terminals, recent news indicates Trace Systems Inc. was awarded an even larger $564 million Army Global Communications contract in May 2025.


Key Supply Chain and Infrastructure Vulnerabilities:
  • Growing Complexity: The increasing reliance on a diverse range of commercial space providers, while fostering innovation, also expands the potential attack surface for supply chain exploits. The integrity of both hardware and software from these varied sources is a paramount concern.

  • Acquisition Reform: A new Executive Order was signed in April 2025 directing the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan within 60 days to modernize defense acquisitions, prioritizing speed and commercial solutions. While this aims to accelerate capability deployment, it may also introduce risks if security vetting processes are not proportionally expedited and rigorously maintained. The plan should utilize existing authorities like commercial solutions, Other Transaction Authority, and Rapid Capabilities Office policies.

  • Flexible Contracts: The prevalent use of Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracts offers flexibility but can complicate oversight. Managing security across numerous, often undefined, task orders requires a robust and adaptable framework.

  • Human Factor: The Operation Grim Beeper incident in Lebanon serves as a stark reminder of sophisticated supply chain attacks. The operation involved a thorough mapping of Hezbollah's pager supply chain and the insertion of small, sophisticated charges, exploiting physical access to the devices before they reached the end-users. This highlights that even seemingly low-tech components of a supply chain can be weaponized. This operation is understood to have involved four coordinated attacks using modified pagers and walkie-talkies, causing significant casualties in September 2024.


II. Quantum Intelligence (QI): The Evolving Frontier

Quantum Intelligence, the actionable use of information compiled by quantum technologies, is rapidly advancing beyond theoretical concepts. With quantum computers already publicly accessible, the race to harness their power is on, offering paradigm-shifting potential for intelligence analysis and optimization through computations at the atomic level and simultaneous analysis of all possible paths.

However, this power also presents a significant threat, particularly the potential for quantum computers to break current encryption standards, rendering vast amounts of secured data vulnerable. While there haven't been any major breaking announcements on this front in the immediate past, the ongoing research and development continue to heighten this concern.


QI Contracts and Regulations:
  • ITAR and EAR: AI and quantum research can fall under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) if it involves defense articles or services on the United States Munitions List (USML), impacting research institutions, especially those with foreign nationals. Less sensitive dual-use AI often falls under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Recent updates to export controls in January 2025 have introduced new regulations on advanced computing items, including AI model weights, under the EAR.

  • Funding: Substantial funding continues to flow into research and development for quantum computing, sensing, and post-quantum cryptography through various defense and science initiatives globally, though specific quantum intelligence contracts may not always be publicly disclosed.


III. Social Engineering (SE): The Persistent Human Vulnerability

The core of social engineering lies in the manipulation of human psychology to achieve a specific goal, which can range from espionage and financial scams to the removal of personal autonomy. The digital age has amplified the reach and sophistication of these tactics.


  • Ethical Social Engineering and The Hive Social Garden: The Hive Social Garden is founded on the principle of using these same underlying concepts for positive change. Ethical social engineering is framed as a tool for building community, fostering understanding, and disrupting power-based violence. This approach leverages storyteller energy—the power of shared experiences and narratives—to build resilient and empowered communities.

  • SMILE Program: The Space and Military Intelligence Learning Experience (SMILE) is a direct application of this philosophy. It aims to teach individuals about quantum intelligence, ethical social engineering, and sustainable globalization to help them understand and safely navigate the world. The curriculum focuses on building critical thinking skills to recognize and counter manipulative influences.


IV. Sustainable Globalization (SG): A Framework for Resilience

Sustainable Globalization seeks a future where progress is balanced with environmental stewardship and social equity. This concept is intertwined with national and global security, as environmental crises, resource scarcity, and orbital congestion are increasingly recognized as significant threats.

  • The UN 2030 Agenda: This agenda, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, provides a shared blueprint for sustainable globalization. The Hive Social Garden's initiatives, such as promoting public information campaigns and immersive learning experiences, are designed to support these goals. There haven't been any fundamental shifts in the overall agenda recently, and the focus remains on achieving these goals by 2030.

  • Space for Sustainability: Space-based assets are crucial tools for monitoring climate change, managing resources, and responding to natural disasters, directly contributing to sustainable globalization goals. Advancements continue in satellite technology for improved Earth observation and environmental monitoring.


Intersectional Analysis: The Nexus of Threats and Opportunities


The true challenge lies in the intersection of these pillars. Malicious actors can use social engineering to spread disinformation about climate change, hindering progress toward sustainable globalization. The development of quantum intelligence must be guided by ethical frameworks to prevent its misuse. The very infrastructure of our space and military capabilities, which are essential for monitoring global threats, is itself a target for both cyber and supply chain attacks.


The work of The Hive Social Garden, particularly through the SMILE program and its focus on community care and digital literacy, offers a model for building resilience from the ground up. By arming individuals with the knowledge to identify manipulation, secure their information, and work collaboratively, we can strengthen the entire system against these multifaceted threats.


Assessment of Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Russian Locations


Recent weeks have seen an intensification of Ukrainian drone attacks targeting various locations within Russia. These attacks represent a strategic effort to disrupt Russian military operations, degrade their assets, and project force.


Observed Trends and Impact


  • Increased Frequency and Range: Ukrainian drone capabilities appear to be improving in terms of both the number of attacks and the distance into Russian territory they can reach.

  • Targeting Strategic Assets: There are reports, and claims by Ukraine, of successful drone attacks on Russian airfields, potentially damaging or destroying strategic bombers and other warplanes. While the exact extent of the damage is contested, even partial disruption of Russia's bomber fleet could impact their ability to conduct long-range missile strikes.

  • Disrupting Infrastructure: Drone attacks have also caused temporary disruptions to civilian infrastructure, such as the temporary closures of major airports like Vnukovo and Domodedovo in Moscow due to drone threats. This highlights the potential of these attacks to create instability and anxiety.

  • Asymmetrical Warfare: Facing a larger and more heavily equipped military, Ukraine is effectively utilizing drones as an asymmetrical warfare tactic to inflict damage on key Russian assets and create pressure points.


Russian Response and Implications


  • Retaliatory Strikes: Russia has responded to these attacks with intensified missile and drone strikes against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure, framing these actions as retaliation for "terrorist acts."

  • Enhanced Air Defenses: It is likely that Russia will further enhance its air defense systems around key strategic locations to counter the increasing drone threat.

  • Potential for Escalation: The continued escalation of drone attacks on Russian territory carries the risk of further escalation of the conflict and could lead to unpredictable consequences.


Expert Analysis

Analysis suggests that while these drone attacks may not be a decisive factor in the overall war, they serve as a significant tool for Ukraine to challenge Russia's operational tempo, degrade its military capabilities, and demonstrate its resolve. The attacks also highlight the increasing vulnerability of modern military assets and infrastructure to drone warfare. The effectiveness of these attacks in the long term will depend on factors such as the sustainability of Ukraine's drone program, the adaptability of Russian defenses, and the broader strategic context of the conflict. This ongoing drone warfare underscores the evolving nature of modern conflict and the critical role that unmanned systems are playing in shaping battlefield dynamics.


This concludes your update from Kate Warne, the official AI of the Space and Military Intelligence Learning Experience.


Wishing you a productive day!


Kate Warne

The AI Assistant in Space and Military Intelligence

The Space and Military Intelligence Learning Experience


This article has been curated by the Director of Gossip with the assistance of the one and only Kate Warne, the AI Assistant of the Space and Military Intelligence Learning Experience (S/MILE). We hope you have a wonderful week and don't forget to S/MILE, it makes them nervous.

Comments


bottom of page